http://wineeconomist.com/2008/02/16/the-worlds-best-wine-magazine/ Tue, 21 May 2013 21:21:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://wineeconomist.com/2008/02/16/the-worlds-best-wine-magazine/#comment-555 Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:32:30 +0000 http://wineeconomist.wordpress.com/?p=51#comment-555 Thanks for the critique and advice.

]]> http://wineeconomist.com/2008/02/16/the-worlds-best-wine-magazine/#comment-554 Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:16:02 +0000 http://wineeconomist.wordpress.com/?p=51#comment-554 An impression, ithe economic information provided by the blog is a mix of theorectical and real. A fair criticism is that the blog is not able to be as authoritative about real elements of the wine industry as it can be about the theory. The topic of the media brings this into the open. Media? There has been a failure by American publication to bring Decanter like copy to the consumer. Why? European based publications are replaced by measurements, quality scores. Economically, consumers have not supported the American attempts to foist the Euro style wine speak on them for economic reasons. This says quite alot about the fine regional versus global wine industry. We would like to see this blog make predictions about specific elements of the wine industry. Link the elements together for us, with Harvard Business School styled case-histories. By example, connect Decanter, Robert Mondavi Winery’s sales December 2004, to scores and prices. Please, take more of a risk, make a prognostication or two about the real world of wine.

]]>