<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Many AVAs are Enough?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wineeconomist.com/2009/01/31/ava/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wineeconomist.com/2009/01/31/ava/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 19:57:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Boyer</title>
		<link>http://wineeconomist.com/2009/01/31/ava/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Boyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 02:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wineeconomist.com/?p=474#comment-251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Mike,

There is not, never has been, and may never be a better model for wine production than that of France. For hundreds of years this has been the most imitated and desirable model for dealing with the agricultural and production aspects of growing fruit and making wine. The bad news is that for hundreds of years we also though capitalism was the ‘end-all’ but that remains to be seen at this point. 

Anyhow back to wine. A look at Bordeaux reveals that like many areas in France, it gets further defined over time, to wit: France, Bordeaux, Mèdoc, Haut Mèdoc, Pauillac and so on. Appellation within appellation, within . . . The remarkable 1st Growth, Haut Brion, was subject to the lower appellation (same as an AVA, only in France) of Graves until it was carved out of the appellation in 1987. This elevated everything going on in Pessac-Léognan.

I believe the AVA status actually elevates the quality of wines made in the United States. Can you not imagine that vignerons in Napa, or Sonoma or anywhere would not want to ensure that the best wines come from their environs? Of course they want to protect their efforts from being usurped by estates with less lofty goals. The Super Tuscan debacle is a prime example of being too restrictive in regulating how wineries produce their products, so certainly we must understand by example that there should be limits to regulatory encroachment.

American Viticulture Areas are completely simplistic compared to other countries, particularly Europe’s. Germany really pops up on my radar when it comes to winemaking and labeling restrictions. Any winemaker in the US can sidestep the regulatory authority anytime by just not including AVA information on the label (just like the Super Tuscan wineries did). More restrictive is the classifications and a great example of excluding themselves from such participation in pretty much anything, is Château Pètrus in Bordeaux’s Right Bank. They could care less and they don’t have to care because their wine is in enormous demand worldwide at amazing release prices. And if you want to realize the very worst nightmare, get into Burgundy and their convoluted world of Napoleonic law – yet they produce some of the best wines in the world.

Europe’s tiny sub-regions, as you call them, help me very much in relying on my wine purchases but one cannot dumb-down the world of wine the way Vino 100 and similar franchises try to do. America’s AVAs are still innocent like our country was before 9/11. Except I feel sorry for these guys in Mendocino who somehow think that Zinfandel and Primitivo are a different grape variety. I applaud Snipes Mountain !

David Boyer classof1855.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike,</p>
<p>There is not, never has been, and may never be a better model for wine production than that of France. For hundreds of years this has been the most imitated and desirable model for dealing with the agricultural and production aspects of growing fruit and making wine. The bad news is that for hundreds of years we also though capitalism was the ‘end-all’ but that remains to be seen at this point. </p>
<p>Anyhow back to wine. A look at Bordeaux reveals that like many areas in France, it gets further defined over time, to wit: France, Bordeaux, Mèdoc, Haut Mèdoc, Pauillac and so on. Appellation within appellation, within . . . The remarkable 1st Growth, Haut Brion, was subject to the lower appellation (same as an AVA, only in France) of Graves until it was carved out of the appellation in 1987. This elevated everything going on in Pessac-Léognan.</p>
<p>I believe the AVA status actually elevates the quality of wines made in the United States. Can you not imagine that vignerons in Napa, or Sonoma or anywhere would not want to ensure that the best wines come from their environs? Of course they want to protect their efforts from being usurped by estates with less lofty goals. The Super Tuscan debacle is a prime example of being too restrictive in regulating how wineries produce their products, so certainly we must understand by example that there should be limits to regulatory encroachment.</p>
<p>American Viticulture Areas are completely simplistic compared to other countries, particularly Europe’s. Germany really pops up on my radar when it comes to winemaking and labeling restrictions. Any winemaker in the US can sidestep the regulatory authority anytime by just not including AVA information on the label (just like the Super Tuscan wineries did). More restrictive is the classifications and a great example of excluding themselves from such participation in pretty much anything, is Château Pètrus in Bordeaux’s Right Bank. They could care less and they don’t have to care because their wine is in enormous demand worldwide at amazing release prices. And if you want to realize the very worst nightmare, get into Burgundy and their convoluted world of Napoleonic law – yet they produce some of the best wines in the world.</p>
<p>Europe’s tiny sub-regions, as you call them, help me very much in relying on my wine purchases but one cannot dumb-down the world of wine the way Vino 100 and similar franchises try to do. America’s AVAs are still innocent like our country was before 9/11. Except I feel sorry for these guys in Mendocino who somehow think that Zinfandel and Primitivo are a different grape variety. I applaud Snipes Mountain !</p>
<p>David Boyer classof1855.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Pogue</title>
		<link>http://wineeconomist.com/2009/01/31/ava/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Pogue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wineeconomist.com/?p=474#comment-250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s impossible to equate US AVAs with terroir. They&#039;re just too big and there&#039;s too much variability in all the physical parameters (soil, bedrock, climate, geomorphology). I had temperature monitors on Snipes Mountain (one of the smallest AVAs) during the growing season last year, and they showed huge variations in several important climate parameters. The top part of Snipes Mountain rises above the cold air pool that regularly forms in the Yakima Valley and so it&#039;s much warmer and has a much longer growing season. The Walla Walla AVA has at least 4 distinct soil terroirs and the average annual rainfall varies from 7 to 24 inches within its boundaries!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s impossible to equate US AVAs with terroir. They&#8217;re just too big and there&#8217;s too much variability in all the physical parameters (soil, bedrock, climate, geomorphology). I had temperature monitors on Snipes Mountain (one of the smallest AVAs) during the growing season last year, and they showed huge variations in several important climate parameters. The top part of Snipes Mountain rises above the cold air pool that regularly forms in the Yakima Valley and so it&#8217;s much warmer and has a much longer growing season. The Walla Walla AVA has at least 4 distinct soil terroirs and the average annual rainfall varies from 7 to 24 inches within its boundaries!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wine Blog</title>
		<link>http://wineeconomist.com/2009/01/31/ava/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wine Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 06:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wineeconomist.com/?p=474#comment-249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the answer to the question of how many AVA&#039;s are enough is easy to answer. AVA&#039;s are set aside for areas with unique soil and micro-climates. So the answer would be in a form of a question; Just how many regions have distinct soil and micro-climates that factor into the unique production of grape varietals? How many regions can produce unique wines in their soil and space? There should be no limit, but only unique characteristics that define them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the answer to the question of how many AVA&#8217;s are enough is easy to answer. AVA&#8217;s are set aside for areas with unique soil and micro-climates. So the answer would be in a form of a question; Just how many regions have distinct soil and micro-climates that factor into the unique production of grape varietals? How many regions can produce unique wines in their soil and space? There should be no limit, but only unique characteristics that define them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
