<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Money, Power and Wine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wineeconomist.com/2011/06/08/money-power-and-wine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wineeconomist.com/2011/06/08/money-power-and-wine/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:21:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anabelle</title>
		<link>http://wineeconomist.com/2011/06/08/money-power-and-wine/#comment-2598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anabelle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wineeconomist.com/?p=4062#comment-2598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Mike
Thanks for another great article with always a different point of view that makes us all wonder.
BR
anabelle]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike<br />
Thanks for another great article with always a different point of view that makes us all wonder.<br />
BR<br />
anabelle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Gillooly</title>
		<link>http://wineeconomist.com/2011/06/08/money-power-and-wine/#comment-2579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Gillooly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wineeconomist.com/?p=4062#comment-2579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your realy thoughtful ( as usual) analysis. I think it is &quot;spot on&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your realy thoughtful ( as usual) analysis. I think it is &#8220;spot on&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
