What Can We Learn from the Wine in Moderation Movement?

paul-giamatti-drinking-a-001Some say that it is time for the wine industry to take the initiative to change perceptions through a generic promotion program.  The “Got Milk?” campaign made people think about milk a bit differently. Maybe a similar initiative could shift the needle on wine?

One concern, as I wrote last week, is that as memorable as “Got Milk?” was, it didn’t prevent milk’s ultimate marketplace decline. Maybe “Got Wine?” isn’t the answer. But what would a better approach look like?

Wine in Moderation

I think there are lessons to be learned by studying the Wine in Moderation movement  that began in Europe a decade ago and has now spread to many corners of the wine world.

new_branding_slideshowWine in Moderation was founded in 2008 at a time when the European wine industry faced a growing threat. It wasn’t just that wine demand was falling — that had been going on for a couple of decades. And it wasn’t just the global financial crisis, either, although that didn’t help. It was rising anti-alcohol sentiments and policies that threatened wine both as an economic activity and also as an integral part of European culture.

I asked George Sandeman, President of the Wine in Moderation Association, to explain WiM’s objectives and the lessons they have learned.

Although a message of “moderation” seemed to be well aligned with the way wines are presented on a day to day basis, focusing quality rather than quantity, we encountered difficulty in waking up the wine sector to the cold wind blowing from Geneva.

Initially there was no recognition of the social responsibility attributed to the “wine sector” (“leave it to beer and spirits!”). At best it was a reluctance to accept the fact that wine needed to be part of the social responsibility which the category required, and at worst we were sleepwalking into the same treatment as tobacco.

The traditional culture of wine was frequently overridden by need to compete in new market environments … Add to this a powerful health lobby working to demonize wine …

So the first two lessons are that the wine industry needs to wake up to sector-wide issues. And the positive story of wine doesn’t tell itself. Someone has to do it.

What wine needed, the group’s founders proposed, was an organization that would help its members tell the counter-story of wine’s benefits when consumed in moderation, and would lean against the wind of damaging anti-alcohol regulations. This was no easy task, Sandeman notes. “The concept of ‘moderation’ is not a simple concept to communicate, varies with different cultures and viewpoints, and is difficult to translate for non-English speaking countries …”

Strength in Numbers 

Wine in Moderation has evolved in the 10+ years since it was founded (you can read about its progress here). As its efforts have gained traction, it has moved from a tight European policy focus to an approach that is broader in both geography and strategy. The map of Wine in Moderation activities is now global and its focus is shifting to education of professionals. Although there are Wine in Moderation activities in the U.S. I suspect that the impact is somewhat limited by the lack of a national coordinating organization,  a role played, for example, by Vinos de Chile, Unioni Italiani Vini, ACIBEV, and FEV in Chile, Italy, Portugal, and Spain respectively.

Seventeen national organization plus several global wine companies (Pernod Ricard, Möet Hennesy, Sogrape), and a host of other groups including WSET and the Institute of the Masters of Wine now support and implement Wine in Moderation programs around the world.

So the third lesson is that there is strength in numbers. It is important to work together on several levels to address important issues.

I first learned about Wine in Moderation from George Sandeman and Susana Garcia Dolla when I was speaking at ACIBEV meetings in Porto a few years ago. Since then I have noted the group’s participation at national and international meetings, always presenting a message of wine in a cultural context.

Wine in Moderation announced a major rebranding in November 2019 with the theme of Choose – Share – Care, which the leaders hope will carry the organization forward into even more ambitious professional and consumer programs in its next decade.

  • CHOOSE to make informed choices; choose the best wine for you to enjoy, choose whether or not to drink.
  • SHARE wine with friends & family, pair with good food and water. Drink slowly and take the time to fully appreciate.
  • CARE about the wine you serve, care about yourself and about others. Avoid excess and enjoy your wine in moderation!

Increased focus on wine tourism is another element of future work. Wine in Moderation’s association with the United Nations World Tourism Organization is one step along the path to providing wineries and regional groups with more tools to shape perceptions and develop the wine tourism experience.

Strike the Right Chord

Two things about Wine in Moderation are especially relevant to the current U.S. concerns. First, while I will admit that Choose-Share-Care does not have that “Got Milk?” punch, the message is one that I think might strike a chord with some of the groups that wine is currently failing to engage.  Health, community, and culture is a strong positive message and one that resonates with young the old alike.

And the way of getting the message out is relevant too. One thing that impresses me about Wine in Moderation (another lesson?) is its multi-layer approach. Here’s how it works:

  • The international coordination is provided by a not-for-profit international association, the WiM Association.
  • In each country, there are one or more WiM national coordinators that support the planning, coordination, implementation and accountability of the programme in their respective countries.
  • WiM supporters join the programme at national level. They actively support a wine culture that inspires well-being and healthy lifestyles and contributes in the prevention and reduction of alcohol related harm.
  • Leading wine companies further support the efforts made at international and national level setting the example with their leadership in social responsibility and high contributions. These leading companies are the Wine in Moderation Ambassadors.

Wine in Moderation movement members are given the tools they need to spread the word, which is a model that could work here in the U.S. Leadership is needed, of course, but it seems to me that our many regional wine associations and wine companies, too, would benefit from bringing a coordinated message into their diverse communications programs.

I can imagine a program with a general message agreed at a high level, but implemented with creative local twists and turns by the dozens of regional wine associations around the U.S. Such a plan would share the creative energy (and cost) while leveraging wine’s broad and diverse base.

Work together? Is that realistic? Well, what’s the alternative? In Europe, as George Sandeman said, the alternative was being regulated like tobacco. The alternative here in the U.S might be a  gradual (and then sudden) wine market bust.

This Changes Everything?

Everyone would like to find a silver bullet that would change everything for wine — in a positive way. But silver bullets are hard to come by and they show up in unexpected places. Do you remember the impact of the 60 Minutes “French Paradox” broadcast? Or the Sideways boost for Pinot Noir? (BTW Miles’ “dump bucket” scene from Sideways is definitely not an example of moderate wine consumption!)

Wine in Moderation has moved the needle in its target regions according to its most recent report. Worth further study, don’t think?

10 responses

  1. Mike,

    I strongly agree with the words and thoughts behind your Moderation post. Count on us for support as this broad effort gets off the ground here in the US. It is both long overdue and very timely.

    Dave Jefferson

    Co-Founder, Silkbush Mountain Vineyards

    Western Cape, South Africa

    http://www.Silkbush.com

    US Hq: 405 Enfrente Road, #200

    Novato, CA 94949 CRE#00427146

    dave@burdell.com

    http://www.Burdell.com

    USA tel: 415.342.3141

    Skype ID: davidwjefferson

  2. I became serious about fine wine when I was diagnosed with heart disease and put on meds. Since the alcohol effects just about doubled in me, ie: drinking two glasses of wine had the similar physiological effects as 4 glasses inmost males, I made it a point to stop drinking just for the sake of drinking.

  3. Maybe “Savor Wine” for a punchier message that captures the same theme? At least it captures my own wine philosophy to drink slowly and appreciatively and to share the experience with friends as part of a warm social gathering.

  4. Very nice insights in here, Mr Veseth!
    I do agree that Wine in moderation could offer some lessons and answers to the wine industry and in particular in the USA. Another sector which is growing and is a current trend is the low and no alcohol drinks, some of them including wine. It is also an answer to the health concerns of the consumer. And the producers are also trying to find innovative products in this direction. Quite inspiring!
    I see both solutions as complementary.
    Best regards
    Angeliki

  5. Echo that Drinking high quality wine in moderation enhances the memory of the quality of the experience as well. Merry Christmas, Linn

    Get Outlook for Android

    ________________________________

  6. There are a couple of aspects you touch on which as a lifelong wine drinker i have never understood
    1. Wine is not just simply an alcoholic beverage to be placed in the same category as beer and spirits . This continued grouping does nothing but a disservice to the world of wine and by extension lends a level of sophistication & moderation which is often wanting in the consumption habits which can be attributed to beer and spirits . Some of this has to do with factors of cost and alcohol level – two strong drivers for beer and spirits to be of choice when moderate drinking is not necessarily the objective
    2. We constantly hear of consumption in moderation as if with wine drinkers they need to be constantly made aware that they might succumb to easily developing cravings for excess . Perhaps there are people who can afford to consume wine in excess as an alternative to cheaper/ stronger alternatives – however i would think there are no end of in depth studies that highlight the abuse of alcohol and beer as opposed to wine .
    Unquestionably within a European context wine in particular is a beverage who’s alcholic level is secondary to its may other attributes
    More of why wine is decidedly different from Beer and Spirits will help to place wine and its consumption in the right context

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: