Wine enthusiasts spend a lot of time and money on magazines and guidebooks and I guess they are never sure if they’re getting the best advice. One of this blog’s most common referring links is the Google search query “world’s best wine magazine?” Want to know the answer? Read on.
If you were going to read just one wine magazine, which one would it be? I decided to use my university students to try to find out. They are plenty smart and know a lot about wine, but they don’t (yet) spend much of their time reading these publications. Perfect subjects for a little media analysis experiment.
Three Ideas of Wine
I passed out copies of perhaps the three most influential wine magazines on the planet and asked my students to analyze them in terms of point of view, intended audience and, of course, which one they would want to read.
The three magazines are Wine Spectator, Decanter and Wine Advocate. Wine Spectator has the highest circulation of any wine magazine in the United States and probably the world. Decanter, a British publication, sells fewer copies, especially here in the U.S., but has global reach.
Robert Parker’s Wine Advocate is a subscription-only publication; most people don’t actually read the Wine Advocate, they just see the rating numbers and blurbs on Wine Wall shelf talkers promoting particular bottles. It’s very influential despite its limited distribution.
The magazines are different in almost every way. They certainly represent three different ideas of wine. Which is best? Well, that depends.
My students quickly labeled Wine Spectator a “lifestyle” magazine and this isn’t just because it has non-wine or tangentially-related-to-wine “lifestyle” articles about food, travel, celebrities and so forth. The advertisements were the giveaway to them. While many wine companies advertise in WS, so do the producers of many luxury and designer products.
(Most wine mags are lifestyle publications, they just have differing ratio and proportion of wine, wine-related and pure lifestyle editorial content. It would be interesting in give the students Wine Spectator, Wine Enthusiast and, say, Wine & Spirits to analyze regarding wine versus lifestyle emphasis. Maybe next term.)
Taken together, the editorial content and the advertising (plus the “coffee table” large format) gave my students a strong sense of a plush lifestyle publication. Wine is part of that world, they said, but not the only part of it. Some were attracted to this lifestyle image and other repulsed. They all found it fascinating.
Decanter’s cover boldly proclaims that it is “The World’s Best Wine Magazine.” Is it?
Decanter is a lifestyle magazine, too, but that’s not what struck my students. Compared to Wine Spectator they noted a more specific wine focus and talked about finding deeper analysis of wine regions and issues. I’m not sure if this is really true or if it reflects Wine Spectator’s high advertisement page count, which might make it seem like there is less wine content.
But for whatever reason Decanter seemed more seriously interested in wine as opposed to lifestyle, according to my students.
Decanter has a different approach to wine ratings, too. Whereas Wine Spectator has many wine reviews in the back covering new releases from the U.S. and many international regions, Decanter typically features in-depth review articles on just two regions. You get more breadth of coverage with Wine Spectator and more depth with Decanter.
Wine Spectator made good browsing, one student said, and sometimes that’s just what you want, but Decanter would be better to read.
My students were shocked by Wine Advocate. Nothing in their experience had prepared them for a “just the facts, ma’am” wine publication. Black type on tan paper. No photos. No ads. Page after page of winery and wine reviews, focusing on three or four regions in each issue.
Not for browsing. Not for reading. You have to study Wine Advocate to get anything out of it they said.
Who reads Wine Advocate? No one would read it for pleasure, according to the students. (I disagree — geeky baseball fans read columns of statistics on their favorite sport. I think there is a similar wine reader.) You would read it for business — because you are a wine retailer, distributor, investor or maybe own a restaurant. This, they said, was a magazine for readers with a serious professional purpose.
The World’s Best Wine Magazine?
So which one is the best? I know my answer. If I could only read one it would be Decanter because I think it is more focused on the supply and demand issues I write about. It’s a wine magazine written by and maybe for “Masters of Wine” who care a lot about commercial concerns.
Unfortunately, Decanter’s specific consumer wine advice is mainly irrelevant to me since the British market it covers is so different from my Wine Wall here in the United States. Very few U.S. wines (apart from the big multinationals) successfully break into the British market, for example, and so we get little space in Decanter compared to wines from Europe and Australia. The market here is just the reverse.
My students weren’t willing to choose a “world’s best wine magazine.” They could see strengths and weaknesses in all three. One student said it boiled down to a trade-off between accessibility (Wine Spectator) and authenticity (the more detailed analysis of terroir you find in publications like Wine Advocate) and there’s no perfect balance between them.
In wine, as in many other areas of life, we want both accessibility and authenticity and I guess my students have already become both surprisingly self-aware of their position in this struggle and skilled at negotiating the complex space it creates. Interesting.
World’s best wine magazine? No such thing. It depends on who you are, what you are looking for and your particular idea of wine.
Thanks for including Wine Spectator in this evaluation. But I would ask your students, is it really fair or accurate to judge a magazine’s editorial content by its advertisers? Vanity Fair includes many of the same luxury advertisers as Wine Spectator, but no one would confuse the two publications, and both contain long-form, investigative journalism that belie the “plush lifestyle” stereotype.
Wine Spectator reviews more wines than any other wine publication, we believe – more than 17,000 in 2009. That’s a pretty hard-core wine magazine.
Yet we recognize that most people who love wine have broader interests, in fine dining, travel and a generally sophisticated and adventurous lifestyle. So we try to speak to those subjects, too.
I agree that what magazine (or wine) is “best” for any given person depends on their tastes and character. I hope your students will take the time to read Wine Spectator. I think those who are interested in wine will find a lot to like.
I agree, Tom, and I do think the students appreciate your point. Thanks for taking the time to comment.
I agree with your summation that the “best” wine mag is the one that fits you best.
As importers of organic wines we are often turning new consumers on to wines for the first time or helping others to change habits. We are frequently asked “How do I increase my wine knowledge?” The common belief is that one needs to invest heavily in reference books and begin reading from start to finish. This ill-advised method usually leaves one burned out on the knowledge gathering part of wine appreciation long before the “A” section of the reference guide is finished.
We always encourage new aficionados to invest in subscriptions to Wine Spectator and Wine Enthusiast (a seemingly lighter quick read) to enable them to participate in conversations about the current trends in Wines and Winemaking. Specific subjects that a reader takes interest in from either of these guides can be later expanded upon by delving deeper with their favorite reference guide.
In this case the “best” wine magazine would be the magazine that best speaks to the reader.
Natural Merchants, LLC
Apologies in advance for self-promotion, but just in case it wasn’t on your radar (and I know you were trying to go with the biggest mags, thus Wine Enthusiast and Wine & Spirits weren’t included), we believe our magazine, Sommelier Journal, is right up the alley of your description of your class (plenty smart and know a lot about wine, turned off by “lifestyle” publications). I’d be happy to send you a copy if you’re interested.
Hi Mike – interesting article & thanks for giving us a perspective from the US. We are a network of wine schools in the UK – localwineschool.com & we are hoping to build a similar network in the US & are looking for people (from all backgrounds but passionate about wine) in the US interested in joining us. Wondering what your views are for best forum for reaching all these people! Sounds from your article like Wine Spectator has the largest & most relevant readership.
For students of the wine business, but also for general interest, I would also suggest adding Gilbert & Gaillard to the mix (http://en.gilbertgaillard.com). It’s a little known publication, but they tend to pack a lot of data into their articles – something I like, but others might find boring.
“Decanter” needs to improve to live up to its self-billing. For example, December’s issue offers a panel tasting of the second wines of Médoc crus classés for 2009 and 2010. 77 wines were sampled and commented on, which leaves another 43 available wines outside the scope of the tasting, including those of all of the premiers crus. Some wines were tasted for only one year. No explanation is offered for these omissions.
Some wines were tasted in only one edition.
Jane Anson states that St.-Pierre has no second wine – and then rates its Esprit 2009 in the comparison tables!
Elsewhere (in the online version) she rates Le Petit Lion 2010 at 94; here, 88.
The “tasting notes” advice is in several cases contradictory to that in the “drink” column: e.g., “drink immediately” …… 2016-2020.
I have on several occasions written to the editor commenting on similar shortcomings and anomalies but have yet to receive a reply.
I subscribed to WS for many years. I subscribed to Robert Parker’s newsletter for a few years. Parker is great for the pros in the field. WS is a wonderful way to learn about new areas– and to plan a trip. Its ratings tend to be very solid. Over the years I have found that I learn very little new in any of these magazines. I have a modest-sized cellar: about a 100 “daily drinkers” and a similar number of collectibles (mainly CA, WA, and Italy). I find that what I need now is ratings; and if I wait for them to appear in a magazine it’s too late. The other negative about magazines is that they spoil the market for those of us who have anticipated them. For years Cinq Cepages and Columbia Crest Reserve cabernet were my little secrets– wines that played way above their price. WS ruined that as they did with several Aussie wines. I no longer tell anyone outside my close circle of friends about “secret” wines– call it paranoia but who wants to see their favorite wines double or even triple in price overnight.