100 Years of Wine Industry Ups & Downs: Highlights of the OIV Centennial Report

The International Organization of Wine & Vine (OIV) is  celebrating its 100th year in 2024. I like to think of the OIV as the United Nations of the wine world although its purpose is scientific and technical, not political. Membership includes most of the world’s most important wine-producing nations with the noteworthy exception of the United States.

To mark its first one hundred years, the OIV  released a report last week on 100 years of evolution of the global wine and vine sector. The report’s perspective differs from most studies in that it is both global and long-term. I have selected three figures from the report that I think are useful to consider as the new wine year begins and we think about where wine is headed in the future.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

#1 The Rise of the International Wine Trade

Wine was mainly multi-local (not really global) 100 years ago. Most French wine was sold in France. Ditto Spain, Italy, and most other places. Only about 10% of wine crossed a national border on its way from producer to consumer.

Now, as the figure above shows, international trade is a much more important factor in wine. Trade is even more significant than the figure above suggests because these are just shipments of wine. The international movements of equipment and supplies, workers (including flying winemakers and flying interns), and technology add to the global web that is wine today.

The surge in international wine trade started in the 1970s and was accelerated by the combined effects of trade agreements that removed political barriers to wine shipments, transportation technology improvements that made shipping more efficient, and domestic retail liberalization in many markets that stimulated demand for imported wine.

But, as you will see in the next section, there was another and perhaps more important reason for the rise of the international wine trade. As domestic wine consumption fell in many countries, exports became a crucial business strategy. Soon big wine countries like Spain were exporting more than they sold at home.

 

 

 

 

 

 

#2 1984 and All That

Global wine consumption increased starting in the 1950s powered by Europe’s rising post-war economies. But global consumption, measured by volume not value, peaked about 40 years ago. European wine sales fell and were not entirely offset by rising consumption in North America and elsewhere.

There are a number of factors that contributed to the slump in European wine sales. One of them is surely an economic transition where consumers substituted quality for quality as their economic security improved. Health issues may also have become more important. The levels of per capita wine consumption in some European regions 100 years ago were unsustainable by today’s standards.

Rising ROW (rest-of-world) wine consumption offset European decline, but only for a time.

 

 

 

 

 

 

#3 Supply-Side Jitters

It is hard to know exactly what is going on with wine production in real time because cyclical and structural changes tend to happen at the same time, frequently punctuated by wild card events such as freak weather. Looking back, however, this accounts for the jittery pattern seen in the figure above.

It is clear that global wine production by volume actually peaked in 1979. (Global area given to vineyards for all purposes peaked in 1978.) Wine production has its ups and downs, but the overall trend is to lower quantities of wine, albeit at rising average prices. The decrease was especially significant in Europe. Rising production elsewhere is not enough to make up the difference.

Rise and Fall

The OIV report makes fascinating reading with more detail than I have room for here (click here to view the pdf of the presentation).

The overall pattern of rise and fall invites the obvious questions: What about the future? Is wine headed toward further decline? Or is an up-swing around the corner?

The OIV report’s conclusions balance optimisism with realism:

Change is a constant
The wine sector is highly resilient
Science and learning make a huge difference
Production and consumption are in constant evolution
The impacts of climate change are accumulating
International trade is integral to the sector
The wine sector is a long-term sector

It is hard to sum up 100 years of wine industry history in a few words, but I think the OIV has done a good job. Wine and the wine business have always changed and evolved and always will do so. A long-term perspective is needed to successfully navigate the shifting currents.

Maybe this isn’t the detailed recipe for future success that you were hoping to find, but it seems like good advice to me.

4 responses

  1. purpose is scientific and technical, not political… I suggest this might be wishful thinking ! The importance of the sector is too important in certain countries not to be .
    Relatively to world production statistics there is a great deal of missing information . Former USSR and Central European vineyards , Asia and China

  2. Keep in mind that contributions from sciences (chemistry -including advanced flavor/aroma analysis, agriculture, botanical genetics, weather, old lost varietals that will work as climate changes.) along with vineyard surpluses have had a significant and positive impact on the quality of lower end wines. There is no excuse for bad, even poor wine now. All of it should be good table wine. Renegade wine tasters, scandals along with those other advances have assaulted much of the romance of wine. What can be left is a new earthiness abetted by technology. I’m hoping local producers will benefit, and with modern containers be able to sell those wines inexpensively in their own locale.

  3. Great and very interesting post, Mike, thanks. I do have one question and a couple of requests, though:
    -On the first figure, I’m reading that as the percentage of wine that crosses a national boundary after production. So 10-ish % back in the 70s, steadily rising to near 50% today. Is that the correct interpretation?
    -On the second and third figures, the magnitude of “World” and “Europe” makes trends in all other continents hard to read down at the bottom. But it looks like North America, for example, has steadily increased in consumption since the 80s, while most others declined. But hard to see because of the scale. Any way to do a second figure with everything but World and Europe?
    -Obviously, tariffs are in the air now, and wine industry will inevitably be targeted going both ways. Would love to hear your take on that issue in a future post.

    • Thanks, Bruce. The best thing to do is to click on the link to the OIV pdf and examine the additional charts that they have there, which I think will answer some of your questions.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The Wine Economist

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading