From Yellow Jersey to Blue Bin: Wine Bottle Innovation Steps Up

Last week’s Wine Economist stressed the need to adapt to changing wine market conditions and to embrace innovations as part of that process. However, innovations are not always readily accepted (often rightly so). There is often the fear that change will simply ruin whatever good or service is being considered.

Curse of the Paperback Novel

The economist Paul Krugman likes to point to an innovation in the publishing industry that was initially met with fear and alarm. It will be the end of publishing and literature as we know it, critics said. What was the next big thing that got authors and publishers all worked up? No, it wasn’t the e-book, as you might guess. It was the paperback, which ended up vastly expanding the literature’s reach.

Paperbacks opened up a new world for book lovers. Packaging is one area where wine has embraced innovation, too, but slowly. Bag-in-box was once seen as only fit for inexpensive bottom-shelf wines, but now premium (which in this context means $4+ per bottle equivalent) 3-liter boxes are a hot commodity, one of the few growth categories in the U.S. market.

B-in-B and Beyond

Bag-in-box shows that wine packaging need not end with the traditional glass bottle, but how far can innovation go (without going too far)? My first glimpse of the possible future was back in 2007 when I wrote about two wines that were part of the Boisset portfolio back then. The innovation: extremely lightweight containers.

French Rabbit got my attention with its lightweight (40 grams for the 1-liter box) tetrapak container. The French Pinot Noir in the box was just fine and I liked the smaller sizes, too. Perfect for picnic, backpack, or boat. This kind of container is no longer unexpected, the innovation found its market, although the most recent sales data suggest that 1-liter boxes are not currently a growing category.

Le Tour de Vin

Boisset introduced me to another packaging innovation that did not catch on quickly: the plastic (or PET) bottle. The wine was a French Sauvignon Blanc brand called Yellow Jersey (a reference to the Tour de France leader’s signature shirt). The yellow bottle with a yellow label and screw-cap closure held a perfectly decent wine in its 56-gram container. A delightful bonus (which I did take advantage of) was that the empty bottle could be re-filled with water and then fit perfectly into a bicycle water bottle holder. What could be better? Seriously.

The idea of the PET wine bottle did not catch on, however, and it is easy to see why. Although it preserved the basic traditional wine bottle format, the lightweight turned some people off and many expressed concerns about the interaction between the wine and the bottle itself. I recently found a bottle producer with a PET product line and the recommended shelf life was 18 months. It was a brave (or forward-thinking) producer who took a chance putting wine in a bottle like that.

Enter changing attitudes and innovation. Lightweight wine bottles now have a broader following as environmental concerns have risen in importance and technology has advanced, too. I know of a couple of firms that are working on hybrid solutions that use lightweight PET for structure and a special internal coating to keep the wine from ever touching the PET itself. (This is similar in concept to the cans that hold canned wine, which have a liner to keep metal and wine from interacting.)

Blue Bin to Blue Bin

Blue Bin Wine from Ron Rubin Winery is the first of this next generation of wine bottles that I have seen on the market. The bottles, which are made by Amcor Rigid Packing, are made from rPET (recycled PET) and the bottles are themselves recyclable, but you put them in the plastics bin rather than the glass bin. The bottles are lined with Plasmax, a thin glass-like oxygen barrier. The Plasmax coating holds the wine, rPET holds the bottle, and everything is recyclable.

The shatterproof Blue Bin bottles weigh just 52 grams compared to 450 grams for a very lightweight glass bottle and 550 to 850 for standard glass bottles (the Wine Economist record for an empty wine bottle so far is 1218 grams). A full bottle of Blue Bin (812 grams on Sue’s precision scale) weighs less than many empty glass bottles.

It is easy to see the weight savings from adopting lighter-weight bottles, and there are additional advantages from efficient recycling. Recycled materials are used to make the bottles and the used bottle is easily recyclable, too. As you can see from the photo above, Blue Bin’s label doesn’t hide the recycling story behind this innovative wine.

The wine’s name comes from the ubiquitous blue recycle bins that Rubin and his team saw everywhere they looked in California. The material for the bottles comes from blue bins and that’s where the empty bottles go, too.

Ron Rubin is also the driving force behind River Road Family Vineyards and Winery in Sebastapol (certified sustainable and B Corp and recently recognized by Sonoma CountyWinegrowers for their commitment to sustainability ) and that’s where the wines (Sauvignon Blanc, Pinot Grigio, Chardonnay, and Rosé) come from.  Initial distribution is targeted at California, Texas, and Florida plus through the winey website.

How was the wine? Sue and I opened a bottle of the Sauvignon Blanc at our annual Open That Bottle Night gathering. The bottle itself was the main topic of conversation. It was so different from any of the others on the table. But while we talked about the bottle, the wine in our glasses steadily disappeared. The consensus was that the wine showed well, especially considering its very reasonable price point (about $13-$15 depending on where you buy it).

Who will buy a wine like Blue Bin? Well, as with Yellow Jersey a few years ago, there are niche markets that will be attracted by the obvious utility of the lightweight and unbreakable bottles for outdoor activities of various sorts. Our tasting group thought that lots of wines and lots of occasions might be well suited to this packaging, with obvious environmental benefits.

But I think there is another audience that will be attracted to the environmental benefits as well as the convenience factor. Restaurant wine-by-the-glass programs might be interested in the easy recycling element. Fine wine? I don’t see DRC and Screaming Eagle in a bottle like this for now. But wine drinkers, especially younger people concerned about the impact of consumption choices on the environment, just might find Blue Bin irresistible.

Blue Bin wines are a big step in the right direction for wine innovation. Can’t wait to see what’s next.

6 responses

  1. I’m appreciative of premium winemakers continued efforts to find alternative, more sustainable packaging, despite the resistance of premium wine consumers (like me) from using them. I’ve decided to try out some of the alternatives for everyday wine, just to support that effort. Thanks for the great post, Mike.

  2. While I am not sure of the “environmental benefits” of plastic, plastic blended and even tetra-oak simply because they really are not recycled, I think it is time for the pendulum to swing.

    The beer business moves Kegs all around the world. We have no problem getting a Stella Artois on tap at our local restaurant but most still think wine should come in a bottle. As a kid, bulk wine was the norm. My parents would order a carafe for the table, and yes this was here in the US.

    I very much hope to see bulk packaging in a truly reusable and recyclable form make a comeback. I can go to the local micro brewery and get a uKeg Growler full of my favorite local brew. Why can’t I go to my local wine shop and fill my SquareKeg with a gallon of Duckhorn Cab from an inert reusable keg?

  3. This might be a repeat, I can’t tell if my last reply is waiting for Mike to moderate my comments or if I didn’t hit reply as I pondered a bit longer.

    Upfront I am not a tetra-pak or plastic fan as I noted in another post about bottles. The facts are we don’t recycle plastic or reuse it as we should. Tetra-Paks require a special facility to recycle and like plastic most end up in the land fill. Quite often BPA is used in the process of bottling liquids in a plastic container. Moreover the aging process is different but screw caps change that too.

    The odd thing to me is that once upon a time we ordered wine by a carafe and half carafe here in the states, just as many still do in Europe. What happened? The grab for more of the almighty dollar? We have become a nation of quick fix disposable solutions. Maybe it is time to charge a lot more for landfill space or will that just land more bottles on the street? It is hard to say. I do hope that products like SquareKeg and uKeg get better and that wine shops will start selling bulk wine that I can fill my growler.

    Both the SquareKeg and uKeg are slightly flawed systems but they work. Both need a better sea. Ideally less threaded parts and more pressure held quick release parts. My garden hose is easier to disconnect than a Square Keg Tap. I reviewed the uKeg when it was new and still worked on CoolToys TV. I’d love to hear Mikes take as I get ready to do a longer term review on both of them.

  4. As much as I appreciate a light bottle or a container that won’t shatter, many technical problems remain with alternative wine packaging. Oxygen permeability is the main issue. That’s the reason wineries using alternative packaging don’t recommend aging the wine produced in these packages. Another problem that occurs with plastic packages is scalping. This is when plastics adsorb flavors and aromas making the wine taste muted and not show its true expression. I can go on with other problems that happen with aluminum cans but I think you get the idea.
    Some wineries that have jumped into alternative packaging without doing the technical research have ended up with a lot of unsaleable product.
    I’m not saying alternative packaging shouldn’t be used, but using it is not as easy as getting a bottling or packaging line that will run the package.

  5. I applaud any efforts to reduce wine’s carbon footprint!
    We use glass because we don’t sell wine within a year of bottling, usually several years. It is inert, no questionable solutes.
    I’ve lobbied for years for standardized reusable bottles. I hope the Oregon project catches on.
    This year we will be bottling in Verallia’s 300 gram bottle, made from recycled glass in electric furnaces. A big step down from the 390-420 bottles we’ve used since 2000.
    I hope the big retailers make it a requirement to use less than 1/2 gram of glass per ml. of product.
    Paul Vandenberg
    Paradisos del Sol Winery and Organic Vineyard

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The Wine Economist

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading